K.C. SINGH DEO versus NILADRI SAHU (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.
Actual physical possession is necessary for claiming Raiyat status under Section 4(1)(h). The relevant date of possession will depend on the nature of the Raiyat claim and must be determined by revenue authorities.
- Parties
- Appellant: K.C. Singh Deo; Respondent: Niladri Sahu (dead) by LRs. and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Orissa High Court Judgment Dated 24.12.86 in O.j.c. No. 602 of 1978
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed, judgment of High Court partly modified.
- Legal Topics
- Raiyat Status, Vested Land, Personal Cultivation, Possession Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K.C. Singh Deo
Appellant
Niladri Sahu (dead) by LRs. and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Orissa High Court Judgment Dated 24.12.86 in O.j.c. No. 602 of 1978
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether possession of land is required to claim Raiyat status under Section 4(1)(h) of Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960
- 2 What is the relevant date of possession for Raiyat right declaration
Ratio Decidendi
Actual physical possession is necessary for claiming Raiyat status under Section 4(1)(h). The relevant date of possession will depend on the nature of the Raiyat claim and must be determined by revenue authorities.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed, judgment of High Court partly modified.
Orders
- Revenue authority to consider question of possession along with appellant's claim as directed by the High Court.
- Parties to bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment