KEDAR NATH SINGH versus STATE OF BIHAR
Section 124A IPC, when interpreted to apply only to acts involving intention or tendency to create disorder, disturbance of law and order, or incitement to violence, is constitutionally valid as a reasonable restriction under Article 19(2). The section must be construed in this manner to uphold its validity.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kedar Nath Singh; Respondent: State of Bihar; Appellant: C. B. Agarwala; Respondent: Gopal Bihari; Attorney General: S. P. Verma
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgments of Patna and Allahabad High Courts
- Outcome
- Criminal Appeal No. 169 of 1957 dismissed; Criminal Appeals Nos. 124-126 of 1958 allowed and remanded.
- Legal Topics
- Sedition, Freedom of Speech, Constitutionality of Penal Code Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kedar Nath Singh
Appellant
State of Bihar
Respondent
C. B. Agarwala
Appellant
Gopal Bihari
Respondent
S. P. Verma
Attorney General
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgments of Patna and Allahabad High Courts
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sections 124A and 505 of Indian Penal Code are void in view of Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution
- 2 Whether section 124A imposes reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order
Ratio Decidendi
Section 124A IPC, when interpreted to apply only to acts involving intention or tendency to create disorder, disturbance of law and order, or incitement to violence, is constitutionally valid as a reasonable restriction under Article 19(2). The section must be construed in this manner to uphold its validity.
Court Disposition
Criminal Appeal No. 169 of 1957 dismissed; Criminal Appeals Nos. 124-126 of 1958 allowed and remanded.
Orders
- Appeal No. 169 of 1957 dismissed.
- Appeals Nos. 124 to 126 of 1958 allowed and remanded to High Court for orders as per Supreme Court's interpretation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment