KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ETC. versus S.N GOVINDA PRABHU & BROTHERS AND OTHERS ETC.

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ETC. versus S.N GOVINDA PRABHU & BROTHERS AND OTHERS ETC.

The Board was within its statutory authority under Section 59 of the Electricity Supply Act to revise tariffs so as to generate a surplus, because a positive approach is directed by Parliament, and failure by the State Government to specify the quantum of surplus does not bar such action so long as the Board's character as a public utility is not compromised. The expenses charged, including arrears of interest, are proper. Tariff differentiation by consumer class is expressly permitted by statute and not shown to be arbitrary in this case.

Parties
Appellant: Kerala State Electricity Board; Respondents: S.N. Govinda Prabhu & Brothers and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 August 1986
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Decision After High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeals allowed. Judgments of the High Court set aside; validity of tariff revisions upheld, with direction to reconsider 1980 tariff for Low Tension Industrial and Commercial Consumers.
Legal Topics
Electricity Tariff, Statutory Authority of Electricity Boards, Judicial Review of Price Fixation, Constitutional Limits on State Instrumentality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kerala State Electricity Board

Appellant

S.N. Govinda Prabhu & Brothers and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Decision After High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Kerala State Electricity Board acted outside its statutory authority by revising electricity tariffs to generate surplus beyond s.59 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948;
  2. 2 Whether the failure of the State Government to specify the quantum of surplus under s.59 prevents the Board from generating any surplus;
  3. 3 Whether items of expenditure not properly chargeable to the revenue account could validly be offset by Board revenues under the tariff revisions

Ratio Decidendi

The Board was within its statutory authority under Section 59 of the Electricity Supply Act to revise tariffs so as to generate a surplus, because a positive approach is directed by Parliament, and failure by the State Government to specify the quantum of surplus does not bar such action so long as the Board's character as a public utility is not compromised. The expenses charged, including arrears of interest, are proper. Tariff differentiation by consumer class is expressly permitted by statute and not shown to be arbitrary in this case.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed. Judgments of the High Court set aside; validity of tariff revisions upheld, with direction to reconsider 1980 tariff for Low Tension Industrial and Commercial Consumers.

Orders

  • Kerala State Electricity Board to reconsider the revised tariff introduced in 1980 for Low Tension Industrial and Low Tension Commercial Consumers only, with liberty to fix separate rates if necessary for 1980 and 1981.
  • Direction does not affect 1982 and 1984 tariff revisions.