KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. versus JHABUA POWER LIMITED AND OTHERS
The State Government's policy directions under Section 108 'guide' but do not bind the State Electricity Regulatory Commission; KSERC exceeded its limited review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC read with Section 94 by allowing review and approving PSAs solely on the basis of subsequent State Government directions without pointing to any error apparent in its earlier order, and therefore APTEL correctly set aside KSERC's review order; the original appeal was restored to APTEL for consideration on other grounds.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.; First Respondent: Jhabua Power Limited; Second Respondent: Jindal India Power Thermal Limited
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Arising From Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Judgment Dated 26 July 2024; Original Appeal (appeal No. 518 of 2023) Restored to APTEL
- Outcome
- Appeals disposed of; Supreme Court agreed with APTEL that KSERC was not bound by State Government directions under Section 108 and that KSERC exceeded its review jurisdiction under Section 94; original appeal (No. 518 of 2023) restored to APTEL.
- Legal Topics
- Section 108, Electricity Act 2003, Section 94, Order XLVII Rule 1, CPC, Regulatory Commission Adjudicatory Discretion, Review Jurisdiction, Power Procurement and Approval of Power Supply Agreements, Standard Bidding Guidelines and Section 63
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.
Appellant
Jhabua Power Limited
First Respondent
Jindal India Power Thermal Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Arising From Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Judgment Dated 26 July 2024; Original Appeal (appeal No. 518 of 2023) Restored to APTEL
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether State Electricity Regulatory Commission is bound by policy directions issued by the State Government under Section 108 of the Electricity Act 2003
- 2 Whether KSERC exceeded its review jurisdiction under Section 94 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC by allowing review based solely on subsequent directions of the State Government
- 3 Whether allowing review on the ground of subsequent government directions amounted to an appeal disguised as review
Ratio Decidendi
The State Government's policy directions under Section 108 'guide' but do not bind the State Electricity Regulatory Commission; KSERC exceeded its limited review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC read with Section 94 by allowing review and approving PSAs solely on the basis of subsequent State Government directions without pointing to any error apparent in its earlier order, and therefore APTEL correctly set aside KSERC's review order; the original appeal was restored to APTEL for consideration on other grounds.
Court Disposition
Appeals disposed of; Supreme Court agreed with APTEL that KSERC was not bound by State Government directions under Section 108 and that KSERC exceeded its review jurisdiction under Section 94; original appeal (No. 518 of 2023) restored to APTEL.
Orders
- Order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity dated 26 July 2024 setting aside KSERC order dated 29 December 2023 is upheld insofar as KSERC exceeded its review jurisdiction
- Original appeal (Appeal No. 518 of 2023) restored to the file of APTEL for further consideration on grounds other than those covered by the impugned order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment