KESHAV versus SHIVAJIRAO & ORS.

The appellant's nomination form should be scrutinized as per the election programme; objections by respondents to the nomination form are to be considered on their merits, and statutory remedy is available for challenging the validity; the High Court's order deleting the appellant's name is set aside.

Parties: Appellant: Keshav; Respondent: Shivajirao & Ors.
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 24 February 2009
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Final Disposition on Appeal
Outcome: Appeal disposed of; High Court's order set aside.
Legal Topics: Article 226, Voters List Deletion, Nomination Form Validity, Statutory Remedy

Constitutional Law Election Law Article 226 Voters List Deletion Nomination Form Validity Statutory Remedy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Keshav

Appellant

Shivajirao & Ors.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Disposition on Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appellant's name should be deleted from the voters list due to the timing of election programme declaration
2 Whether the appellant's enrollment after the cut-off date affects nomination form validity
3 Availability and appropriateness of statutory remedy for nomination form scrutiny

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal disposed of; High Court's order set aside.

Orders

Appellant's nomination form to be scrutinized.
Respondents may raise objections to nomination paper, which should be considered uninfluenced by High Court's observations.