AJAY HASIA ETC. versus KHALID MUJIB SEHRAVARDI & ORS. ETC.
The Jammu & Kashmir Regional Engineering College, though registered as a society, is so pervasively controlled and funded by government that it constitutes a 'State' under Article 12, and is thus amenable to constitutional obligations. The allocation of 33 1/3% of total marks for viva voce is arbitrary, but the selections for 1979-80 are not interfered with due to lapse of time. For future selections, allocation above 15% for viva voce is unconstitutional. The different procedure for admission does not violate Article 14 per se, unless it is arbitrary.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Ajay Hasia; Respondent: Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition / Final Decision
- Outcome
- writ petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of 'state' Under Article 12, Arbitrariness in State Action, Fundamental Rights, Admissions in Educational Institutions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ajay Hasia
Petitioner
Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Jammu & Kashmir Regional Engineering College, registered as a society, is a 'State' within Article 12 of the Constitution and amenable to writ jurisdiction
- 2 Whether allocation of 33 1/3% of total marks for the viva voce test is arbitrary and unreasonable
- 3 Whether prescribing different admission procedures for candidates belonging to Jammu & Kashmir and other States violates Article 14
Ratio Decidendi
The Jammu & Kashmir Regional Engineering College, though registered as a society, is so pervasively controlled and funded by government that it constitutes a 'State' under Article 12, and is thus amenable to constitutional obligations. The allocation of 33 1/3% of total marks for viva voce is arbitrary, but the selections for 1979-80 are not interfered with due to lapse of time. For future selections, allocation above 15% for viva voce is unconstitutional. The different procedure for admission does not violate Article 14 per se, unless it is arbitrary.
Court Disposition
writ petitions dismissed
Orders
- Best fifty students from 1979-80 who failed admission will be granted admission for academic year 1981-82 in addition to normal intake.
- Each party to bear its own costs of writ petitions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment