KHAN BAHADUR SHAPOOR FREDOOM MAZDA versus DURGA PROSAD CHAMARIA AND OTHERS
Since the only subsisting relation between the parties at the date of the letter was that of mortgagee and mortgagor, and the letter acknowledged the existence of that jural relationship, it clearly amounted to an acknowledgment under section 19 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.
- Parties
- Appellant: Khan Bahadur Shapoor Fredoom Mazda; Respondent: Durga Prosad Chamaria; Appellant: A. G. Ratnaparkhi; Respondent: P. K. Chatterjee; Appellant: W. S. Barlingay
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 1961
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Decree of the Calcutta High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Acknowledgment of Liability, Mortgage, Computation of Limitation Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khan Bahadur Shapoor Fredoom Mazda
Appellant
Durga Prosad Chamaria
Respondent
A. G. Ratnaparkhi
Appellant
P. K. Chatterjee
Respondent
W. S. Barlingay
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Decree of the Calcutta High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a letter written by the mortgagor to the mortgagee amounts to acknowledgment of liability under section 19 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908
Ratio Decidendi
Since the only subsisting relation between the parties at the date of the letter was that of mortgagee and mortgagor, and the letter acknowledged the existence of that jural relationship, it clearly amounted to an acknowledgment under section 19 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment