KIRPAL KAUR ANO ANR. versus V.M. SINGH AND ORS.

Applicant is permitted to withdraw his interlocutory application for deposit of amount. Application for impleadment is dismissed as infructuous. The Court need not go into correctness or otherwise of allegations made in affidavits; aggrieved parties may pursue appropriate remedies in other proceedings.

Parties: Appellant: Kirpal Kaur and another; Respondent: V.M. Singh and others; Respondent: Respondent-in-person
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 30 August 2007
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application in Supreme Court
Outcome: Interlocutory Application permitted to be withdrawn; related applications dismissed as infructuous; deposited amount to be returned to applicant.
Legal Topics: Partition, Settlement, Execution of Consent Decree, Withdrawal of Interlocutory Application

Family Law Civil Procedure Partition Settlement Execution of Consent Decree Withdrawal of Interlocutory Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Kirpal Kaur and another

Appellant

V.M. Singh and others

Respondent

Respondent-in-person

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application in Supreme Court

Legal Issues

1 Whether permission should be accorded to the applicant to deposit the amount pursuant to an earlier order
2 Whether the applicant should be permitted to withdraw the interlocutory application

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Interlocutory Application permitted to be withdrawn; related applications dismissed as infructuous; deposited amount to be returned to applicant.

Orders

I.A. No. 16 in both appeals is permitted to be withdrawn.
Other interlocutory applications are dismissed as infructuous.