KISHORILAL HANS versus RAJA RAM SINGH & ORS.
A candidate whose caste is not specifically included in the relevant Presidential Order or statutory list of Scheduled Castes for the concerned district cannot claim eligibility to contest a reserved seat, even if his caste is listed in other districts or is argued to be a sub-caste of a notified caste. Inquiry to establish such equivalence is not permissible under Art. 341 of the Constitution.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kishorilal Hans; Respondent: Raja Ram Singh; Respondent Advocate: G. L. Sanghi; Respondent Advocate: K. P. Gupta
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1971
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Madhya Pradesh High Court Judgment on Election Petition
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Scheduled Castes/tribes, Reserved Constituencies, Presidential Orders Under Constitution, Art. 341 Scheduled Castes Specification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kishorilal Hans
Appellant
Raja Ram Singh
Respondent
G. L. Sanghi
Respondent Advocate
K. P. Gupta
Respondent Advocate
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Madhya Pradesh High Court Judgment on Election Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jatav caste is included as a Scheduled Caste in Datia district under the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 and Scheduled Tribes Lists (Modification) Order, 1956
- 2 Whether the appellant Kishorilal Hans, a Jatav by caste, was qualified to contest a reserved Scheduled Caste seat
- 3 Whether inquiry can be made if Jatav is a sub-caste of Chamar (a notified Scheduled Caste) under Art. 341 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
A candidate whose caste is not specifically included in the relevant Presidential Order or statutory list of Scheduled Castes for the concerned district cannot claim eligibility to contest a reserved seat, even if his caste is listed in other districts or is argued to be a sub-caste of a notified caste. Inquiry to establish such equivalence is not permissible under Art. 341 of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeal (C.A. 2123/69) dismissed
- Cross-appeal (C.A. 2237/69) dismissed as not pressed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment