KISHORILAL HANS versus RAJA RAM SINGH & ORS.

KISHORILAL HANS versus RAJA RAM SINGH & ORS.

A candidate whose caste is not specifically included in the relevant Presidential Order or statutory list of Scheduled Castes for the concerned district cannot claim eligibility to contest a reserved seat, even if his caste is listed in other districts or is argued to be a sub-caste of a notified caste. Inquiry to establish such equivalence is not permissible under Art. 341 of the Constitution.

Parties
Appellant: Kishorilal Hans; Respondent: Raja Ram Singh; Respondent Advocate: G. L. Sanghi; Respondent Advocate: K. P. Gupta
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
30 November 1971
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Madhya Pradesh High Court Judgment on Election Petition
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Scheduled Castes/tribes, Reserved Constituencies, Presidential Orders Under Constitution, Art. 341 Scheduled Castes Specification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kishorilal Hans

Appellant

Raja Ram Singh

Respondent

G. L. Sanghi

Respondent Advocate

K. P. Gupta

Respondent Advocate

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Madhya Pradesh High Court Judgment on Election Petition

  1. 1 Whether Jatav caste is included as a Scheduled Caste in Datia district under the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 and Scheduled Tribes Lists (Modification) Order, 1956
  2. 2 Whether the appellant Kishorilal Hans, a Jatav by caste, was qualified to contest a reserved Scheduled Caste seat
  3. 3 Whether inquiry can be made if Jatav is a sub-caste of Chamar (a notified Scheduled Caste) under Art. 341 of the Constitution

Ratio Decidendi

A candidate whose caste is not specifically included in the relevant Presidential Order or statutory list of Scheduled Castes for the concerned district cannot claim eligibility to contest a reserved seat, even if his caste is listed in other districts or is argued to be a sub-caste of a notified caste. Inquiry to establish such equivalence is not permissible under Art. 341 of the Constitution.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal (C.A. 2123/69) dismissed
  • Cross-appeal (C.A. 2237/69) dismissed as not pressed