KRISHAN LAL versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

KRISHAN LAL versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Respondent No.4 satisfied five years practical/teaching experience requirement as period includes certificate course and apprenticeship; non-deposit of provident fund does not nullify experience certificates.

Parties
Appellant: Krishan Lal; Respondents: State of Haryana & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
16 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appointment to Post, Criterion of Experience for Service, Provident Fund Relevance in Assessing Experience
Service Law Appointment to Post Criterion of Experience for Service Provident Fund Relevance in Assessing Experience

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Krishan Lal

Appellant

State of Haryana & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether respondent no. 4 fulfilled 5 years practical/teaching experience for appointment as Mechanist Grinder Instructor
  2. 2 Whether experience certificates are invalid if issued by establishments not subscribing to provident fund

Ratio Decidendi

Respondent No.4 satisfied five years practical/teaching experience requirement as period includes certificate course and apprenticeship; non-deposit of provident fund does not nullify experience certificates.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs