KRISHNA BHATACHARJEE versus SARATHI CHOUDHURY AND ANR.
Retention of Stridhan articles by the husband is a continuing offence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. A wife, even after judicial separation, remains an 'aggrieved person' and may claim relief under Section 12 of the Act so long as marital status and custody persist. The application for recovery of Stridhan is not barred by limitation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Krishna Bhatacharjee; Respondent: Sarathi Choudhury; Respondent: Another Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, Stridhan, Judicial Separation Vs Divorce, Limitation, Economic Abuse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Krishna Bhatacharjee
Appellant
Sarathi Choudhury
Respondent
Another Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, for seizure of Stridhan articles is maintainable after judicial separation.
- 2 Whether retention of Stridhan by the husband constitutes a continuing offence under the Act.
- 3 Whether the application by the wife was barred by limitation.
Ratio Decidendi
Retention of Stridhan articles by the husband is a continuing offence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. A wife, even after judicial separation, remains an 'aggrieved person' and may claim relief under Section 12 of the Act so long as marital status and custody persist. The application for recovery of Stridhan is not barred by limitation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Orders passed by the High Court and the courts below are set aside.
- Matter is remitted to the learned Magistrate to proceed with the application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, on merits.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment