KRISHNA KUMAR AGRAWAL AND ORS. versus JAI KUMAR JAIN AND ANR.
Only the unauthorisedly constructed offending wall, as found by the Commissioner, is to be demolished; existing double-storeyed building is not to be demolished under the decree. The decree is interpreted to require removal only of recent unauthorised construction adjacent to the northern wall.
- Parties
- Appellant: Krishna Kumar Agrawal and Ors.; Respondent: Jai Kumar Jain and Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 January 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Disposition
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of with specified directions; no costs awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Unauthorised Construction, Demolition, Interpretation of Decree, Setback Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Krishna Kumar Agrawal and Ors.
Appellant
Jai Kumar Jain and Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interpretation of the operative part of the decree requires demolition of the entire building or only the offending wall
- 2 Whether existing constructions prior to 1982-83 should be demolished
Ratio Decidendi
Only the unauthorisedly constructed offending wall, as found by the Commissioner, is to be demolished; existing double-storeyed building is not to be demolished under the decree. The decree is interpreted to require removal only of recent unauthorised construction adjacent to the northern wall.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of with specified directions; no costs awarded.
Orders
- Only the offending wall constructed recently is to be demolished, not the entire building.
- Appellants directed to remove unauthorised construction as found by the Commissioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment