K RISHNAMURTHI VASUDEORAO DESHPANDE AND ANR. versus DHRUWARAJ
The right of an adopted son under Hindu law relates back to the date of death of the adoptive father, entitling him to divest heirs who took the property subject to defeasance by possible adoption. Succession by collaterals remains defeasible so long as the possibility of adoption by a widow subsists. Accordingly, the appellants' title was defeasible and the respondent as adopted son could divest them.
- Parties
- Appellant: Krishnamurthi Vasudeorao Deshpande; Respondent: Dhruvraj
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 1961
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment Dated August 17, 1954
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Coparcenary, Inheritance, Defeasance of Title
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Krishnamurthi Vasudeorao Deshpande
Appellant
Dhruvraj
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment Dated August 17, 1954
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an adopted son can divest the heirs of properties of his adoptive father and grandfather upon his adoption
- 2 Whether the principle of relation-back applies to inheritance that has vested in heirs prior to adoption
Ratio Decidendi
The right of an adopted son under Hindu law relates back to the date of death of the adoptive father, entitling him to divest heirs who took the property subject to defeasance by possible adoption. Succession by collaterals remains defeasible so long as the possibility of adoption by a widow subsists. Accordingly, the appellants' title was defeasible and the respondent as adopted son could divest them.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment