KU. SONIA BHATIA versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
A gift, being gratuitous and lacking legal consideration as understood in law, is not a 'transfer for adequate consideration' under Section 5(6) proviso (b) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. Thus, gifts made after the prescribed date are to be ignored when determining surplus land to be...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: KU. Sonia Bhatia; Respondent: State of U.P.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings, Interpretation of 'consideration' in Gifts, Validity of Gifts Under Land Ceiling Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KU. Sonia Bhatia
Appellant
State of U.P.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a gift of property for love and affection constitutes a transfer for adequate consideration under Section 5(6) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960
- 2 Whether such gifts made after the prescribed date should be ignored in determining ceiling area
Ratio Decidendi
A gift, being gratuitous and lacking legal consideration as understood in law, is not a 'transfer for adequate consideration' under Section 5(6) proviso (b) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. Thus, gifts made after the prescribed date are to be ignored when determining surplus land to be taken under the statute.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs.
- The High Court judgment allowing the writ petition is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment