KUNNASHADA MUTHUKOYA versus ADMINISTRATOR U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP AND ANR.
The Supreme Court held that under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986, the entitlement to a revised pay scale is determined with reference to the pre-revised scale applicable to the employee as of 1.1.1986, not the group classification of the post. Rule 5 does not support granting the revised Group 'C' pay scale to employees whose existing scale corresponds to a lower grade. The decision in Hariharan was correctly decided and is binding.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kunnashada Muthukoya; Respondents: Administrator, U.T. of Lakshadweep & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Pay Revision, Government Servant, Central Civil Services (revised Pay) Rules, 1986
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kunnashada Muthukoya
Appellant
Administrator, U.T. of Lakshadweep & Anr.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant, a lineman in the Electricity Department classified as Group 'C', is entitled to the higher revised pay scale applicable to Group 'C' posts under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986, or only to the revised scale corresponding to his pre-revised pay scale.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986, the entitlement to a revised pay scale is determined with reference to the pre-revised scale applicable to the employee as of 1.1.1986, not the group classification of the post. Rule 5 does not support granting the revised Group 'C' pay scale to employees whose existing scale corresponds to a lower grade. The decision in Hariharan was correctly decided and is binding.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed as having no merit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment