K.V. SUDHARSHAN versus A. RAMAKRISHNAPPA & ORS.
Inam lands granted under the Mysore (Religious and Charitable Inams) Abolition Act, 1955, to a family member for being archak are for the benefit of the joint family and available for partition; grant of occupancy rights to the eldest son does not exclude other members from their share.
- Parties
- Appellant: K.V. Sudharshan; Respondent: A. Ramakrishnappa; Respondent: Venkataramachar; Respondent: Wife of A. Ramakrishnappa
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Partition of Joint Family Property, Religious and Charitable Inam Lands, Occupancy Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K.V. Sudharshan
Appellant
A. Ramakrishnappa
Respondent
Venkataramachar
Respondent
Wife of A. Ramakrishnappa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether inam lands granted under Mysore (Religious and Charitable Inams) Abolition Act, 1955 constitute individual property of the grantee or joint family property available for partition
- 2 Whether grant of occupancy rights to eldest son disentitles other family members to claim partition
Ratio Decidendi
Inam lands granted under the Mysore (Religious and Charitable Inams) Abolition Act, 1955, to a family member for being archak are for the benefit of the joint family and available for partition; grant of occupancy rights to the eldest son does not exclude other members from their share.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned Judgment of High Court set aside
- Appeal remanded to High Court to decide share of each party in Schedule 'C' properties within 3 months from supply of judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment