LACHHMAN DASS versus RAM LAL & ANR.
An unregistered award affecting immovable property over Rs.100 cannot be looked into by the Court for pronouncement under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act; subsequent registration does not retrospectively validate the award; the award must be registered at the relevant time for enforcement.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lachhman Dass; Respondent: Ram Lal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment and order of the High Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Arbitral Awards and Registration, Immovable Property, Indian Registration Act, Arbitration Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lachhman Dass
Appellant
Ram Lal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an arbitral award affecting immovable property of value more than Rs. 100 requires registration to be enforced by a court
- 2 Whether subsequent registration of an award outside statutory period validates it retrospectively
- 3 Whether a court may pronounce judgment upon an unregistered award affecting immovable property
Ratio Decidendi
An unregistered award affecting immovable property over Rs.100 cannot be looked into by the Court for pronouncement under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act; subsequent registration does not retrospectively validate the award; the award must be registered at the relevant time for enforcement.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment and order of the High Court set aside.
Orders
- Judgment and order of Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside.
- Award not made rule of the court; cannot be enforced for want of registration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment