LACHMAN DAS ARORA versus GANESHI LAL AND ORS
Since the High Court's notification permitted filing and hearing of election petitions during summer vacations, the benefit of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act was not available; the election petition was filed after the limitation period and was barred by time.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lachman Das Arora; Respondent: Ganeshilal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal on Limitation Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Election Petitions, Applicability of General Clauses Act Section 10, Representation of the People Act Section 81(1) and 86(1)
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lachman Das Arora
Appellant
Ganeshilal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal on Limitation Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the election petition filed after the expiry of 45 days but on the reopening day after summer vacations was within limitation
- 2 Applicability of Section 10 of General Clauses Act to election petitions
Ratio Decidendi
Since the High Court's notification permitted filing and hearing of election petitions during summer vacations, the benefit of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act was not available; the election petition was filed after the limitation period and was barred by time.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Election petition is held barred by limitation and correctly dismissed by High Court
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment