LAKSHMI CHAND KHAJURIA & ORS. versus SMT. ISHROO DEVI
Mani Ram could dispose of his share in joint family property by Will as permitted by s. 27 of the Jammu & Kashmir Hindu Succession Act, 1956; item 1(a) was self-acquired property; the Will was validly executed; for items 1(b) and 2, the share capable of disposition is remitted to High Court to determine according to Mitakshara law as applicable to Jammu & Kashmir.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lakshmi Chand Khajuria; Appellant: Appellant No. 2 (Wife of Mani Ram); Appellant: Appellant No. 3 (Grand-daughter of Mani Ram); Respondent: Smt. Ishroo Devi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court From Jammu & Kashmir High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of; decree modified and remitted.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Will, Joint Family Property, Mitakshara Law, Partition, Hereditary Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lakshmi Chand Khajuria
Appellant
Appellant No. 2 (Wife of Mani Ram)
Appellant
Appellant No. 3 (Grand-daughter of Mani Ram)
Appellant
Smt. Ishroo Devi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court From Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Will executed by Purohit Mani Ram is valid under s. 27 of the Jammu & Kashmir Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
- 2 Whether income from hereditary priesthood constitutes joint family property under Mitakshara law.
- 3 Extent of disposition of joint family property by Will as per Mitakshara law and sect. 27.
Ratio Decidendi
Mani Ram could dispose of his share in joint family property by Will as permitted by s. 27 of the Jammu & Kashmir Hindu Succession Act, 1956; item 1(a) was self-acquired property; the Will was validly executed; for items 1(b) and 2, the share capable of disposition is remitted to High Court to determine according to Mitakshara law as applicable to Jammu & Kashmir.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of; decree modified and remitted.
Orders
- Decree confirmed in favour of respondent for item 1(a).
- Share in items 1(b) and 2 to be determined by High Court according to applicable law; respondent entitled to at least one-third share.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment