LALA RAM versus HARI RAM
Section 417(4), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, itself prescribes a period of limitation, and it is open to the legislature to do so; 'entertain' means 'file or receive by the court'; application for leave to appeal was within time since time for obtaining certified copy is deducted; no merit for benefit under Probation of Offenders Act as age not proved below 21.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lala Ram; Respondent: Hari Ram
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 1969
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Rajasthan High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation, Right to Appeal, Probation of Offenders, Private Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lala Ram
Appellant
Hari Ram
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Rajasthan High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal was within the prescribed limitation under s.417(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898.
- 2 Whether the word 'entertain' in s.417(4) CRPC refers to filing or hearing the application.
- 3 Whether the High Court rightly interfered with acquittal and convicted the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 417(4), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, itself prescribes a period of limitation, and it is open to the legislature to do so; 'entertain' means 'file or receive by the court'; application for leave to appeal was within time since time for obtaining certified copy is deducted; no merit for benefit under Probation of Offenders Act as age not proved below 21.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal fails and is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment