MAKINENI VENKATA SUJATHA versus LAND REFORMS TRIBUNAL AND ANR.

MAKINENI VENKATA SUJATHA versus LAND REFORMS TRIBUNAL AND ANR.

A daughter's minor status as on 1.1.1975 precluded her from claiming a separate declaration or deduction from excess land under both Section 29A of the Hindu Succession Act or Section 4A of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act. Acquisition of new rights under Section 29A in 1985 does not retrospectively alter the holding or liability determined as on the notified date under Land Ceiling Law.

Parties
Petitioner: M.V. Sujatha; Respondent: Land Reforms Tribunal; Respondent: Second Respondent (Father of Petitioner)
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 October 2000
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissal at Admission Stage
Outcome
Special Leave Petition dismissed at admission stage; reasons recorded in judgment.
Legal Topics
Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings, Coparcenary Rights of Daughters, Interpretation of Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973, Interpretation of Section 29 a, Hindu Succession Act as Amended by Andhra Pradesh, Application of Section 4 a, Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act
Land Law Hindu Law Family Law Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Coparcenary Rights of Daughters Interpretation of Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 Interpretation of Section 29 A, Hindu Succession Act as Amended by Andhra Pradesh Application of Section 4 A, Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M.V. Sujatha

Petitioner

Land Reforms Tribunal

Respondent

Second Respondent (Father of Petitioner)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissal at Admission Stage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Section 29A of the Hindu Succession Act as introduced by AP Amendment Act 13/86 confers a right on minor daughters for deduction of share from excess land of father's family unit as on 1.1.1975
  2. 2 Whether Section 4A introduced in Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 grants a minor daughter the same rights as a major son with respect to ceiling area

Ratio Decidendi

A daughter's minor status as on 1.1.1975 precluded her from claiming a separate declaration or deduction from excess land under both Section 29A of the Hindu Succession Act or Section 4A of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms Act. Acquisition of new rights under Section 29A in 1985 does not retrospectively alter the holding or liability determined as on the notified date under Land Ceiling Law.

Court Disposition

Special Leave Petition dismissed at admission stage; reasons recorded in judgment.

Orders

  • Petition dismissed.