LEKH RAJ (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. & ORS. versus RANJIT SINGH & ORS.
Since the appellate decree became final in 1965 and the amendment came into force in 1973, the rights of the parties were crystallized and unaffected by the amendment. The amendment does not apply retrospectively to concluded proceedings, and it only applies to Punjab, not Haryana. Furthermore, new objections cannot be raised for the first time at the Supreme Court stage.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lekh Raj (Dead) through L.Rs. & Ors.; Respondent: Ranjit Singh & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order Dated 04.08.2006 in C.r. No. 3823 of 2005, Which Affirmed the Orders of the Executing and Appellate Courts on Execution of Decree
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decree, Retrospective Application of Amendment, Rights Crystallized Prior to Amendment, Jurisdictional Extent of Statute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lekh Raj (Dead) through L.Rs. & Ors.
Appellant
Ranjit Singh & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order Dated 04.08.2006 in C.r. No. 3823 of 2005, Which Affirmed the Orders of the Executing and Appellate Courts on Execution of Decree
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a decree passed prior to the 1973 amendment of the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920, and which had attained finality, is rendered a nullity and unenforceable due to the amendment and its retrospective operation
- 2 Whether an objection not raised at any earlier stage can be raised for the first time on appeal in execution proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Since the appellate decree became final in 1965 and the amendment came into force in 1973, the rights of the parties were crystallized and unaffected by the amendment. The amendment does not apply retrospectively to concluded proceedings, and it only applies to Punjab, not Haryana. Furthermore, new objections cannot be raised for the first time at the Supreme Court stage.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- All objections to execution overruled
- Execution application allowed as per terms of the decree
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment