MOHAN SINGH versus LATE AMAR SINGH THROUGH THE LRS.
No exceptional circumstances were made out to enable tenant to challenge order granting limited period tenancy permission after expiry; burden to prove fraud was not discharged; interlocutory order by ARC did not prevent landlord from objecting; records tampered and false affidavits filed justify criminal proceedings.
- Parties
- Appellant/tenant: Mohan Singh; Respondent/landlord: Late Amar Singh through LRs
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limited Period Tenancy, Fraud, Misrepresentation, Eviction, Tampering of Judicial Records, Procedure for Filing Rejoinder and Additional Evidence, Rules of Practice in Civil Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohan Singh
Appellant/tenant
Late Amar Singh through LRs
Respondent/landlord
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tenant can challenge the validity of permission for limited period tenancy after expiry of tenancy claiming fraud or misrepresentation
- 2 Whether the tenant proved absence in Court at the time of grant of second permission under Section 21
- 3 Whether permission granted under Section 21 was without jurisdiction and unenforceable
Ratio Decidendi
No exceptional circumstances were made out to enable tenant to challenge order granting limited period tenancy permission after expiry; burden to prove fraud was not discharged; interlocutory order by ARC did not prevent landlord from objecting; records tampered and false affidavits filed justify criminal proceedings.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Registrar of Supreme Court directed to file complaint before appropriate court and set criminal law in motion against tenant (Mohan Singh)
- Tenant directed to deliver possession of premises to respondents by 26.9.1998
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment