SARPANCH, . LONAND GRAMPANCHAYAT versus RAMGIRI GOSAVI & ANR.
The Authority properly exercised judicial discretion in condoning delay for claims after January 1, 1961, as the employees acted under honest though mistaken belief in the administrative process, and the Authority’s decision was not shown to be arbitrary, capricious, or unjust; therefore, neither the High Court nor the Supreme Court should interfere.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lonand Grampanchayat; Respondent: Ramgiri Gosavi; Respondent: Another respondent
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 1967
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Minimum Wages, Condonation of Delay, Judicial Discretion, Supervision Under Article 227
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lonand Grampanchayat
Appellant
Ramgiri Gosavi
Respondent
Another respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Authority under s. 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 exercised proper discretion in condoning delay
- 2 Whether circumstances justified interference by the High Court or Supreme Court with the Authority's discretion
Ratio Decidendi
The Authority properly exercised judicial discretion in condoning delay for claims after January 1, 1961, as the employees acted under honest though mistaken belief in the administrative process, and the Authority’s decision was not shown to be arbitrary, capricious, or unjust; therefore, neither the High Court nor the Supreme Court should interfere.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment