LONANKUTTY versus THOMMAN & ANOTHER
Failure to appeal the decision of the District Court arising out of the respondents' suit, wherein the issue of easementary right for fishing was directly and substantially in issue and finally decided, attracts the application of res judicata and bars re-adjudication of that issue in an appeal arising out of the appellant's suit.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lonankutty; Respondent: Thomman; Respondent: Annam
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order Dated 8.4.1971 of the Kerala High Court in S. A. No. 1190/65
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Easementary Rights, Practice and Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lonankutty
Appellant
Thomman
Respondent
Annam
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order Dated 8.4.1971 of the Kerala High Court in S. A. No. 1190/65
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether second appeal from only one suit is barred by res judicata when common judgment in cross appeals from two suits on identical questions was not appealed from the other suit.
- 2 Whether remanding judgment not appealed against can be challenged in appeal from final decision.
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to appeal the decision of the District Court arising out of the respondents' suit, wherein the issue of easementary right for fishing was directly and substantially in issue and finally decided, attracts the application of res judicata and bars re-adjudication of that issue in an appeal arising out of the appellant's suit.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of the High Court set aside.
- Judgment of the District Court restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment