LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.GOPAL DAS (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS. versus GOPAL DAS (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS.
The finding of the High Court that no development was carried out on the land in question is not supported by the record as 97.1% of acquired land has been developed with necessary infrastructure; thus, development charges are payable by the respondents while seeking restoration of land under Section 17 of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
- Parties
- Appellant: Lucknow Development Authority & Anr.; Respondent: Gopal Das (deceased) through LRs & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Division Bench Judgment of Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Land Acquisition, Urban Planning, Development Charges
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucknow Development Authority & Anr.
Appellant
Gopal Das (deceased) through LRs & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Division Bench Judgment of Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents are liable to pay development charges on restoration of acquired land under Section 17 of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973
- 2 Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the order for payment of development charges
Ratio Decidendi
The finding of the High Court that no development was carried out on the land in question is not supported by the record as 97.1% of acquired land has been developed with necessary infrastructure; thus, development charges are payable by the respondents while seeking restoration of land under Section 17 of the UP Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of High Court setting aside the claim of development charges is set aside
- Order quantifying development charges of Rs.1,57,22,056/- raised without hearing is set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment