M. HARIHARASUDHAN versus R. KARMEGAM AND ORS.
The Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 does not oust the jurisdiction of the civil court either expressly or by necessary implication. The Act provides only an additional remedy for compensation, and Section 14 of the Act clearly recognizes concurrent jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain a suit for damages. Thus, claims for damages under the common law can still be pursued in civil courts.
- Parties
- Appellant: M. Hariharasudhan; Respondents: R. Karmegam and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision; Matter Remitted to High Court for Decision on Merits
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside; matter remitted to High Court for decision on merits.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Civil Courts, Ouster of Jurisdiction, Statutory Remedies, Concurrent Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. Hariharasudhan
Appellant
R. Karmegam and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision; Matter Remitted to High Court for Decision on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 excludes the jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain a suit for damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 does not oust the jurisdiction of the civil court either expressly or by necessary implication. The Act provides only an additional remedy for compensation, and Section 14 of the Act clearly recognizes concurrent jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain a suit for damages. Thus, claims for damages under the common law can still be pursued in civil courts.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside; matter remitted to High Court for decision on merits.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Judgment of the High Court set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment