M. NARASIMHACHAR versus THE STATE OF MYSORE
Retirement at age 55, reduction of pension, and recovery of losses were valid under Mysore Services Regulations; reduction of pension does not constitute reduction in rank under Art. 311(2), and no notice was required under Revised Pension Rules at normal retirement age.
- Parties
- Appellant: M. Narasimhachar; Respondent: The State of Mysore
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 1959
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal by Special Leave / Supreme Court Appeal From March 31, 1956 Mysore High Court Judgment in Writ Petition No. 140 of 1955
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Retirement, Pension Reduction, Recovery From Pension, Departmental Proceedings, Notice Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. Narasimhachar
Appellant
The State of Mysore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal by Special Leave / Supreme Court Appeal From March 31, 1956 Mysore High Court Judgment in Writ Petition No. 140 of 1955
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compulsory retirement, reduction of pension, and recovery of losses from retired government servant complied with Mysore Service Regulations and Constitution of India, Art. 311(2)
- 2 Requirement of notice prior to retirement or pension reduction under applicable rules
Ratio Decidendi
Retirement at age 55, reduction of pension, and recovery of losses were valid under Mysore Services Regulations; reduction of pension does not constitute reduction in rank under Art. 311(2), and no notice was required under Revised Pension Rules at normal retirement age.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs and Court fee
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment