M. VENKATARAMANA HEBBAR (D) BY L.RS. versus M. RAJAGOPAL HEBBAR AND ORS
The suit for partition by the respondents was liable to be decreed as the family settlement was not fully acted upon because the stipulated amount had not been paid by the appellant; mere execution of the deed did not constitute partition by metes and bounds unless all terms, including payment, were fulfilled.
- Parties
- Appellant: M. Venkatramana Hebbar (D) by L.Rs.; Respondents: M. Rajagopal Hebbar and Ors
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Partition Suit, Family Settlement, Joint Family Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. Venkatramana Hebbar (D) by L.Rs.
Appellant
M. Rajagopal Hebbar and Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit for partition by respondents is liable to be decreed as the family settlement was not given effect
- 2 Whether the deed of family settlement required compulsory registration
- 3 Effect of non-payment of stipulated amounts under the family settlement
Ratio Decidendi
The suit for partition by the respondents was liable to be decreed as the family settlement was not fully acted upon because the stipulated amount had not been paid by the appellant; mere execution of the deed did not constitute partition by metes and bounds unless all terms, including payment, were fulfilled.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Suit for partition to be decreed in favour of plaintiffs/respondents.
- Plaintiff is entitled to one-fourth share in the suit property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment