M. VISHWESHWARA SHASTRY versus M. GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT AND ORS.
The appellant provided sufficient bona fide reasons for delay, and no denial or objection from the opposite party; therefore, summary rejection of the extension application was unjustified and time for filing written statement was to be further extended.
- Parties
- Appellant: M. Vishweshwara Shastry; Respondent: M. Gopalakrishna Bhat; Respondents: Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Summary Rejection of Application for Extension of Time to File Written Statement
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Delayed Filing of Written Statement, Extension of Time, Bona Fide Mistake
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. Vishweshwara Shastry
Appellant
M. Gopalakrishna Bhat
Respondent
Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Summary Rejection of Application for Extension of Time to File Written Statement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to extension of time for filing the written statement due to bona fide mistake
- 2 Whether the High Court was justified in summarily rejecting the application for extension of time
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant provided sufficient bona fide reasons for delay, and no denial or objection from the opposite party; therefore, summary rejection of the extension application was unjustified and time for filing written statement was to be further extended.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of High Court rejecting extension application set aside
- Written statement to be filed within four weeks from today if not already filed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment