N.C. DAS versus M.A. MOHSIN AND ANR.

There was no perversity in the High Court's order holding compliance with its directive; therefore, no grounds exist for interfering in contempt jurisdiction.

Parties: Petitioner: N.C. DAS; Respondent: M.A. MOHSIN; Respondent: ANR.
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 09 September 1997
Procedural Posture: Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Dismissal of SLP Against High Court Contempt Order
Outcome: Petition dismissed
Legal Topics: Non Compliance With Court Orders, Scope of Appellate Review in Contempt Proceedings

Constitutional Law Contempt of Court Non Compliance With Court Orders Scope of Appellate Review in Contempt Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

N.C. DAS

Petitioner

M.A. MOHSIN

Respondent

ANR.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Dismissal of SLP Against High Court Contempt Order

Legal Issues

1 Whether appellate court should interfere with High Court's finding of compliance in contempt proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

There was no perversity in the High Court's order holding compliance with its directive; therefore, no grounds exist for interfering in contempt jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

Special Leave Petition is dismissed
Petition dismissed