MADAN LAL LOHIA versus ASSISTANT CONTROLLER & ORS.
Penalty cannot be imposed on a garnishee under s. 73(5) of Estate Duty Act r/w s. 46(1) of Income Tax Act, 1922 as the garnishee is not an assessee or accountable person in default; garnishee proceeding can validly be taken for recovery without prior notice of demand to the accountable person; the garnishee notice...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Madan Lal Loria; Respondents: Assistant Controller & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Calcutta High Court Judgment Dated 1st December 1969
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Estate Duty Recovery, Garnishee Proceedings, Imposition of Penalty, Joint and Several Liability for Estate Duty
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Madan Lal Loria
Appellant
Assistant Controller & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Calcutta High Court Judgment Dated 1st December 1969
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether penalty can be imposed on a garnishee under s. 73(5) of Estate Duty Act, 1953 read with s. 46(1) & (5A) of Income Tax Act, 1922
- 2 Scope and validity of garnishee proceedings for estate duty arrears
- 3 Liability of accountable persons for estate duty on entire property passing on death
Ratio Decidendi
Penalty cannot be imposed on a garnishee under s. 73(5) of Estate Duty Act r/w s. 46(1) of Income Tax Act, 1922 as the garnishee is not an assessee or accountable person in default; garnishee proceeding can validly be taken for recovery without prior notice of demand to the accountable person; the garnishee notice to appellant for payment of rent due to the estate is valid, but penalty imposed is set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Order dated 25th March 1964 imposing penalty of Rs. 3,000/- on appellant quashed and set aside
- Notice dated 9th January 1962 upheld as valid
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment