MADAN LAL versus STATE OF PUNJAB

MADAN LAL versus STATE OF PUNJAB

The appellant, having admittedly received and failed to disburse funds for an express purpose, is rightly convicted for criminal breach of trust under section 409 IPC; absence of sanction under section 196A(2) CrPC for conspiracy does not vitiate conviction under section 409.

Parties
Appellant: Madan Lal; Respondent: State of Punjab
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
05 April 1967
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Punjab High Court Decision in Criminal Revision No. 824 of 1963
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Criminal Breach of Trust, Conspiracy, Sanction for Prosecution, Misjoinder of Charges, Burden of Proof
Criminal Law Criminal Breach of Trust Conspiracy Sanction for Prosecution Misjoinder of Charges Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Madan Lal

Appellant

State of Punjab

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Punjab High Court Decision in Criminal Revision No. 824 of 1963

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant could be convicted for criminal breach of trust under section 409 IPC when the officer was acquitted
  2. 2 Whether absence of sanction under section 196A(2) CrPC vitiated the trial
  3. 3 Whether conviction under section 409 IPC was valid without a charge simplicitor

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant, having admittedly received and failed to disburse funds for an express purpose, is rightly convicted for criminal breach of trust under section 409 IPC; absence of sanction under section 196A(2) CrPC for conspiracy does not vitiate conviction under section 409.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction of appellant under section 409 IPC upheld
  • No interference in High Court judgment