MAHADEO versus BABU UDAI PRATAP SINGH AND OTHERS
Misprinting of respondent's name amounted to non-compliance with Rule 22 but did not automatically void the election; material effect must be proved, and since respondent failed to prove material effect, the challenge to appellant's election cannot be sustained.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mahadeo; Respondent No. 1: Babu Udai Pratap Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 1965
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; election petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Invalidity of Election, Irregularity in Ballot Paper, Misprinting of Candidate's Name, Material Impact on Election Result
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahadeo
Appellant
Babu Udai Pratap Singh
Respondent No. 1
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether misprinting of respondent's name on ballot paper renders appellant's election invalid under s. 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
- 2 Whether such misprinting constituted an irregularity in the form or design of the ballot paper under Rule 56(2)(g) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961
- 3 Whether the non-compliance with Rules materially affected the result of the election
Ratio Decidendi
Misprinting of respondent's name amounted to non-compliance with Rule 22 but did not automatically void the election; material effect must be proved, and since respondent failed to prove material effect, the challenge to appellant's election cannot be sustained.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; election petition dismissed
Orders
- Order of High Court set aside
- Election petition dismissed with costs throughout
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment