UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS versus MAHAVEER C. SINGHVI
The order discharging the respondent from service was punitive, based on allegations of misconduct which formed its foundation. No opportunity to defend was provided. Consistent Supreme Court precedents require a departmental enquiry in such circumstances; thus, the discharge order is invalid and rightly set aside by the High Court.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Union of India and Others; Respondent: Mahaveer C. Singhvi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Appeal From Delhi High Court's Writ Order
- Outcome
- Special Leave Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discharge of Probationer, Natural Justice, Punitive Termination, Departmental Enquiry
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India and Others
Petitioner
Mahaveer C. Singhvi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Appeal From Delhi High Court's Writ Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a probationer can be discharged during probation for misconduct without an opportunity to defend
- 2 Whether the discharge order was punitive in character and violated principles of natural justice
Ratio Decidendi
The order discharging the respondent from service was punitive, based on allegations of misconduct which formed its foundation. No opportunity to defend was provided. Consistent Supreme Court precedents require a departmental enquiry in such circumstances; thus, the discharge order is invalid and rightly set aside by the High Court.
Court Disposition
Special Leave Petition dismissed
Orders
- Petitioners to pay Rs.25,000/- as costs to respondent
- All interim orders vacated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment