MAHENDER PRATAP versus KRISHAN PAL AND ORS.

MAHENDER PRATAP versus KRISHAN PAL AND ORS.

The election petition was based on misleading facts, with inconsistent averments regarding the timing of the recount application. The Supreme Court held that intentional false averments in an election petition justified dismissal, and in petitions for recount of votes, strict proof and truthful facts are required.

Parties
Appellant: Mahender Pratap; Respondents: Krishan Pal and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
22 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Recount of Votes, False Averments in Election Petition, Verification of Pleadings
Election Law Recount of Votes False Averments in Election Petition Verification of Pleadings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mahender Pratap

Appellant

Krishan Pal and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for recounting of votes was wrongly rejected by the Returning Officer
  2. 2 Whether inconsistency and false averments in pleadings warrant dismissal of the election petition

Ratio Decidendi

The election petition was based on misleading facts, with inconsistent averments regarding the timing of the recount application. The Supreme Court held that intentional false averments in an election petition justified dismissal, and in petitions for recount of votes, strict proof and truthful facts are required.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Appellant to pay costs of Rupees twenty five thousand: Rupees twenty thousand to Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee and Rupees five thousand to Respondent No.1 (Returned Candidate).