MAINUDDIN ABDUL SATTAR SHAIKH versus VIJAY D. SALVI
The respondent, as the drawer of the cheque on his personal account, is liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 irrespective of whether the company was made a party to the complaint, since the liability is attracted to the individual drawer.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mainuddin Abdul Sattar Shaikh; Respondent: Vijay D. Salvi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal Against Acquittal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Acquittal set aside and respondent convicted under Section 138 of NI Act.
- Legal Topics
- Dishonour of Cheque, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, Personal Liability of Drawer, Company Liability for Offence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mainuddin Abdul Sattar Shaikh
Appellant
Vijay D. Salvi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal Against Acquittal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be imposed on the drawer in his personal capacity when the company is not made a party to the complaint
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent, as the drawer of the cheque on his personal account, is liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 irrespective of whether the company was made a party to the complaint, since the liability is attracted to the individual drawer.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Acquittal set aside and respondent convicted under Section 138 of NI Act.
Orders
- Respondent sentenced to five months simple imprisonment for offence under Section 138 NI Act.
- Respondent to pay compensation of Rs.1,48,400 with simple interest at 9% per annum to the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment