MAJ. GENL. A.S. GAURAYA & ANR. versus S.N. THAKUR AND ANR.
A Magistrate cannot exercise any inherent jurisdiction to restore or recall a complaint once dismissed for default/absence of complainant, unless specifically enabled by the Criminal Procedure Code; all subsequent proceedings following such recall are without jurisdiction and nullity.
- Parties
- Appellant: Maj. Genl. A.S. Gauraya; Respondent: S.N. Thakur
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal No. 184 of 1979 / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Inherent Powers of Subordinate Criminal Courts, Article 141 Binding Nature, Restoration of Complaint, Dismissal for Non Appearance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maj. Genl. A.S. Gauraya
Appellant
S.N. Thakur
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal No. 184 of 1979 / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether subordinate criminal courts have inherent jurisdiction outside the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code
- 2 Whether the Magistrate can recall or restore a dismissed complaint for non-appearance of complainant
- 3 The scope and binding nature of Article 141 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
A Magistrate cannot exercise any inherent jurisdiction to restore or recall a complaint once dismissed for default/absence of complainant, unless specifically enabled by the Criminal Procedure Code; all subsequent proceedings following such recall are without jurisdiction and nullity.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Delhi High Court is set aside.
- Order of the Magistrate dated 6.1.1972 dismissing the complaint is restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment