MAKHAN LAL versus ASHARFI LAL AND ORS.

MAKHAN LAL versus ASHARFI LAL AND ORS.

The trial court and first appellate court properly evaluated the evidence and reached factual findings which the High Court had no valid reason to disturb; therefore, their decisions should be restored and the High Court's judgment set aside.

Parties
Appellant: Makhanlal; Respondent: Asharfi Lal; Respondents: Asharfi Lal and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
25 March 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Concurrent Findings of Fact, Permanent Injunction, Possession, Damages, Family Property Disputes
Civil Procedure Concurrent Findings of Fact Permanent Injunction Possession Damages Family Property Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Makhanlal

Appellant

Asharfi Lal

Respondent

Asharfi Lal and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court was right in disturbing the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the trial Court and the appellate Court
  2. 2 Whether contributing some amount towards construction of the disputed house entitles appellant to claim half share in the house
  3. 3 Whether the material evidence was ignored by the courts below

Ratio Decidendi

The trial court and first appellate court properly evaluated the evidence and reached factual findings which the High Court had no valid reason to disturb; therefore, their decisions should be restored and the High Court's judgment set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Court stands set aside
  • Judgment of the appellate Court and trial Court stands confirmed