MALA DEVI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

MALA DEVI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

The Court held that the deceased had acquired the status of a temporary railway servant for purposes of the Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993 after completion of the necessary continuous service and screening and therefore his family was entitled to family pension under Rule 75 read with Rule 18(3); denial of family pension on grounds of non-regularization or for being short of ten years was unjustified. The respondents were directed to compute and pay arrears and regular family pension within four months and an ex-gratia amount of Rs.5,00,000 was awarded under Article 142.

Parties
Appellant: Mala Devi; Respondent: Union of India & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
16 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Family Pension, Entitlement to Family Pension, Temporary Railway Servant, Regularization of Service, Ex Gratia Award, Article 142
Pension Law Administrative Law Railway Law Constitutional Law Family Pension Entitlement to Family Pension Temporary Railway Servant Regularization of Service +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mala Devi

Appellant

Union of India & Ors.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the widow of a temporary railway servant who died in harness after more than one year but less than ten years of continuous service is entitled to family pension under the Railway Pension Rules, 1993 and related provisions
  2. 2 Whether denial of family pension on grounds of non-regularization and shortfall of qualifying service (ten years) was justified
  3. 3 Proper statutory provisions governing computation and grant of family pension (Rule 75 r/w Rule 18(3) and Rule 1515 Indian Railway Establishment Manual)

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the deceased had acquired the status of a temporary railway servant for purposes of the Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993 after completion of the necessary continuous service and screening and therefore his family was entitled to family pension under Rule 75 read with Rule 18(3); denial of family pension on grounds of non-regularization or for being short of ten years was unjustified. The respondents were directed to compute and pay arrears and regular family pension within four months and an ex-gratia amount of Rs.5,00,000 was awarded under Article 142.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Impugned order dated 12.05.2016 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna and the Order dated 23.12.2015 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna, set aside
  • Respondents to calculate arrears of family pension and pay arrears and regular family pension to the appellant within four months