MALIK RAM versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN
The authority under s. 68-D(2) is empowered to reject a draft scheme outright and is required to permit relevant evidence, oral or documentary, to ensure a proper quasi-judicial hearing; failure to do so renders approval of the scheme invalid.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Malik Ram; Respondent: State of Rajasthan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 1961
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal, Writ Petition / Appeal From Rajasthan High Court; Decision on Merits by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; scheme approval set aside; matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
- Legal Topics
- Motor Vehicles Act Scheme Approval, Quasi Judicial Hearing, Procedural Fairness, State Transport Undertaking
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Malik Ram
Appellant
State of Rajasthan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal, Writ Petition / Appeal From Rajasthan High Court; Decision on Merits by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the officer hearing objections under s. 68-D(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act has power to reject the draft scheme in its entirety
- 2 Whether the officer has power and duty to take evidence, oral or documentary, from parties when deciding objections
Ratio Decidendi
The authority under s. 68-D(2) is empowered to reject a draft scheme outright and is required to permit relevant evidence, oral or documentary, to ensure a proper quasi-judicial hearing; failure to do so renders approval of the scheme invalid.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; scheme approval set aside; matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Orders
- Set aside the order approving the scheme.
- Directed that the draft scheme be reconsidered after giving a proper hearing as per the Supreme Court's observations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment