MANGU KHAN AND ORS. versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 is justified where evidence establishes common intention among accused to cause fatal injuries, even if precise blow cannot be attributed to individual accused, and discrepancies or minor injuries to accused do not vitiate prosecution case.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mangu Khan and Ors.; Respondent: State of Rajasthan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Common Intention, Appreciation of Evidence, Indian Penal Code, Right of Private Defence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mangu Khan and Ors.
Appellant
State of Rajasthan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 is justified when individual injuries cannot be ascribed to particular accused.
- 2 Whether failure to explain injuries sustained by accused vitiates prosecution case.
- 3 Whether High Court can convict under Section 302 read with Section 34 when Sessions Court acquitted under Section 302.
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 is justified where evidence establishes common intention among accused to cause fatal injuries, even if precise blow cannot be attributed to individual accused, and discrepancies or minor injuries to accused do not vitiate prosecution case.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appellants convicted under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 and Section 323/34 IPC; sentenced to life imprisonment and fines as imposed by High Court; sentences to run concurrently.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment