STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. versus MANISHA DWIVEDI AND ANR.

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. versus MANISHA DWIVEDI AND ANR.

The special leave petitions are not entertained due to unexplained delay of more than one year in filing and because the impugned order is an interlocutory order, with no special circumstances justifying interference.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Petitioner: State of U.P. and Ors.; Respondent: Manisha Dwivedi and Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
31 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Petition Against Interlocutory Orders in Pending Writ Petition
Outcome
Petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Special Leave Petition, Delay/laches, Interlocutory Orders
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Special Leave Petition Delay/laches Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of U.P. and Ors.

Petitioner

Manisha Dwivedi and Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Petition Against Interlocutory Orders in Pending Writ Petition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court should entertain a Special Leave Petition against an interlocutory order in a pending writ petition when there is an unexplained delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The special leave petitions are not entertained due to unexplained delay of more than one year in filing and because the impugned order is an interlocutory order, with no special circumstances justifying interference.

Court Disposition

Petitions dismissed

Orders

  • Interlocutory applications allowed
  • Special leave petitions dismissed