MANOHAR LAL (D) BY LRS. versus UGRASEN (D) BY LRS. & ORS.

MANOHAR LAL (D) BY LRS. versus UGRASEN (D) BY LRS. & ORS.

Land Policy does not entitle the owner to allotment of land of his choice or in commercial area. The Chief Minister's allotment was ultra vires and not permissible in law. The review petition discloses no valid grounds as the applicant failed to comply with required conditions and the competent authorities' directions.

Parties
Applicant: Manohar Lal (Dead) by LRs.; Respondents: Ugrasen (Dead) by LRs. & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
24 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Review Petition (civil) No. 1292 of 2010 in Civil Appeal No. 973 of 2007 / Supreme Court Review Following Prior Supreme Court Decision
Outcome
Review Petition dismissed.
Legal Topics
Land Policy, Allotment of Acquired Land, Competence of Authorities, Review of Prior Orders
Land Acquisition Land Policy Allotment of Acquired Land Competence of Authorities Review of Prior Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Manohar Lal (Dead) by LRs.

Applicant

Ugrasen (Dead) by LRs. & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Review Petition (civil) No. 1292 of 2010 in Civil Appeal No. 973 of 2007 / Supreme Court Review Following Prior Supreme Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the land owner is entitled to allotment of land of his choice under the State Land Policy
  2. 2 Whether allotment of land in commercial area by the Chief Minister was valid
  3. 3 Whether the review petition should be entertained

Ratio Decidendi

Land Policy does not entitle the owner to allotment of land of his choice or in commercial area. The Chief Minister's allotment was ultra vires and not permissible in law. The review petition discloses no valid grounds as the applicant failed to comply with required conditions and the competent authorities' directions.

Court Disposition

Review Petition dismissed.

Orders

  • Review application not entertained; previous Supreme Court order stands.