MANOREY @ MANOHAR versus BOARD OF REVENUE (U.P.) AND ORS.
An eligible agricultural labourer belonging to a Scheduled Caste who fulfills the conditions of Section 122B(4F) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 is statutorily deemed to be admitted as Bhumidhar with non-transferable rights; therefore, such a person is entitled to have the revenue records corrected, and is not required to undergo a separate allotment process under Section 195. The orders of the Board of Revenue and High Court, which denied such relief, are unsustainable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Manorey @ Manohar; Respondents: Board of Revenue (U.P.) and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment in Writ Petition Under Article 226
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- U.p. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, Bhumidhar Rights, Correction of Revenue Records, Deeming Provisions, Socio Economic Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manorey @ Manohar
Appellant
Board of Revenue (U.P.) and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment in Writ Petition Under Article 226
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an agricultural labourer belonging to a Scheduled Caste in occupation of Gaon Sabha land is entitled to be recognized as Bhumidhar with non-transferable rights under Section 122B(4F) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and whether he can seek amendment of revenue records without a formal allotment under Section 195.
Ratio Decidendi
An eligible agricultural labourer belonging to a Scheduled Caste who fulfills the conditions of Section 122B(4F) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 is statutorily deemed to be admitted as Bhumidhar with non-transferable rights; therefore, such a person is entitled to have the revenue records corrected, and is not required to undergo a separate allotment process under Section 195. The orders of the Board of Revenue and High Court, which denied such relief, are unsustainable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed.
Orders
- Orders of the Board of Revenue and High Court are set aside.
- Order of the Sub-Divisional Officer is restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment