DELTA MECHCONS (INDIA) LTD. versus M/S MARUBENI CORPORATION
The procedure for appointment of presiding arbitrator agreed upon between the parties has broken down. The jurisdiction of the Chief Justice of India under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is rightly invoked for appointment of the presiding arbitrator, and the nationality restriction in the arbitration agreement must be respected.
- Parties
- Petitioner: DELTA MECHCONS (INDIA) LTD.; Respondent: MARUBENI CORPORATION
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Petition / Application Under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Presiding Arbitrator
- Outcome
- Application allowed, jurisdiction under Section 11 invoked; parties directed to submit agreed or nominated names for presiding arbitrator.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Arbitrator, International Arbitration, Arbitral Tribunal Constitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DELTA MECHCONS (INDIA) LTD.
Petitioner
MARUBENI CORPORATION
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Petition / Application Under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Presiding Arbitrator
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the procedure for appointment of presiding arbitrator has broken down, justifying intervention under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
- 2 Whether the nationality restriction for presiding arbitrator applies when the appointment is made by the Chief Justice of India
Ratio Decidendi
The procedure for appointment of presiding arbitrator agreed upon between the parties has broken down. The jurisdiction of the Chief Justice of India under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is rightly invoked for appointment of the presiding arbitrator, and the nationality restriction in the arbitration agreement must be respected.
Court Disposition
Application allowed, jurisdiction under Section 11 invoked; parties directed to submit agreed or nominated names for presiding arbitrator.
Orders
- Parties to submit agreed name or two names each with consent for appointment as Chairman of arbitral tribunal.
- Statements to be filed in writing by July 10, 2007; further orders on July 13, 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment