MASUMSHA HASANASHA MUSALMAN versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside and conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC restored; Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act does not apply in absence of specific evidence that the act was committed on the basis of the victim's caste.
- Parties
- Appellant: Masumsha Hasanasaha Musalman; Respondent: State of Maharashtra
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Conviction by Bombay High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Indian Penal Code Section 302, Indian Penal Code Section 304 Part II, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 Section 3(2)(v)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Masumsha Hasanasaha Musalman
Appellant
State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From Conviction by Bombay High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction under Section 302 IPC was justified or only Section 304 Part II IPC was applicable
- 2 Whether the offence falls under Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside and conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC restored; Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act does not apply in absence of specific evidence that the act was committed on the basis of the victim's caste.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of High Court convicting appellant under Section 302 IPC set aside
- Conviction under Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act set aside and appellant acquitted on this count
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment