MATHURA PRASAD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

MATHURA PRASAD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Punishment of removal imposed by disciplinary authority was unsustainable as statutory procedures under Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968, Rules 10(2) and 10(3) were not complied with; reasons were not recorded, and no opportunity of hearing was given before differing findings were made. Matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Parties
Appellant: Mathura Prasad; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; impugned judgment of High Court set aside
Legal Topics
Misconduct, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mathura Prasad

Appellant

Union of India and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal From High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether statutory procedure relating to conduct of disciplinary proceedings as prescribed under Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968 were not complied with and hence the punishment of removal imposed by the disciplinary authority was sustainable

Ratio Decidendi

Punishment of removal imposed by disciplinary authority was unsustainable as statutory procedures under Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968, Rules 10(2) and 10(3) were not complied with; reasons were not recorded, and no opportunity of hearing was given before differing findings were made. Matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; impugned judgment of High Court set aside

Orders

  • Matter remitted to the disciplinary authority for fresh consideration in accordance with statutory procedures
  • Appellant entitled to costs; Counsel's fee assessed at Rs.15,000/-