MAYAWATI versus MARKANDEYA CHAND AND ORS.
The Speaker's findings regarding existence of a split in BSP MLAs and consequent immunity from disqualification under Tenth Schedule are not vitiated by perversity; judicial review does not permit the Court to substitute its own judgment unless the finding is so perverse that no reasonable tribunal could have arrived at it.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mayawati; Respondent: Markandey A Chand; Respondents: Others (12 BSP MLAs, Janatantrik Bahujan Samaj Party)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disqualification of Legislative Assembly Members, Defection, Speaker's Power, Judicial Review, Split in Political Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mayawati
Appellant
Markandey A Chand
Respondent
Others (12 BSP MLAs, Janatantrik Bahujan Samaj Party)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision of the Speaker to not disqualify the respondent MLAs under Tenth Schedule was vitiated by perversity
- 2 Scope of judicial review over Speaker's decision under Tenth Schedule
- 3 Conditions required to establish a split in a political party for purposes of immunity from disqualification
Ratio Decidendi
The Speaker's findings regarding existence of a split in BSP MLAs and consequent immunity from disqualification under Tenth Schedule are not vitiated by perversity; judicial review does not permit the Court to substitute its own judgment unless the finding is so perverse that no reasonable tribunal could have arrived at it.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The Speaker's order is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment