MD.ALL @ GUDDU versus STATE OF U.P.
The conviction was based on testimony of prosecutrix which was not found to be credible or unimpeachable; unexplained delay in FIR, non-examination of key witnesses, and absence of corroborative medical evidence raised doubt, and conclusions of trial court and High Court were unsupportable by evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Md. Ali @ Guddu; Appellant: Fazal; Appellant: Mehmood; Appellant: Ali Waris; Respondent: State of U.P.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, conviction set aside
- Legal Topics
- Kidnapping, Rape, Appreciation of Evidence, Delay in FIR, Witness Testimony
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Md. Ali @ Guddu
Appellant
Fazal
Appellant
Mehmood
Appellant
Ali Waris
Appellant
State of U.P.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC was sustainable in light of evidence
- 2 Whether delay in lodging FIR affects prosecution case
- 3 Whether sole testimony of prosecutrix is sufficient for conviction in this case
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was based on testimony of prosecutrix which was not found to be credible or unimpeachable; unexplained delay in FIR, non-examination of key witnesses, and absence of corroborative medical evidence raised doubt, and conclusions of trial court and High Court were unsupportable by evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, conviction set aside
Orders
- Conviction and sentences under Sections 363, 366, and 376 IPC set aside
- Appellants acquitted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment